DecipherU · Course

AI Security Operations Mastery

The cybersecurity AI-augmented SOC course for practitioners who need to win the alert-volume race.

For the SOC analyst, threat hunter, or cybersecurity operations leader watching AI-augmented detection rewrite the playbook. This 14-module course is for the practitioners who run the augmented SOC, not the ones whose alerts AI handles instead. Built on the SANS rigor (SEC504, SEC511, SEC555, FOR578) plus MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, and the AI-augmented SOC patterns from Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic. 55-70 hours of study plus a 30-40 page capstone with rubric.

What completing this course actually does for your comp

BLS OES May 2024 + Lightcast 2024 AI premium

Target role after completion

AI Threat Detection Engineer

Base comp band: $128K$155K (BLS median ± Enterprise tier).

With AI fluency (this course)

$158K$171K

+17% to +27% lift on AI-fluent postings (Lightcast 2024).

Time investment

~70 hours

Self-paced. Most learners ship the capstone within 8–12 weeks of focused study.

What this replaces

  • · Vendor-specific SOC training that ages with each tooling change
  • · Behavioral-detection playbooks scattered across blog posts
  • · Volt Typhoon / Salt Typhoon advisory reading without applied SIEM exercises

Pricing posture

Standalone: $597. Bundled inside Operator ($129/mo) and Frontier ($299/mo), pays for itself if you would buy 3+ standalone courses.

CC available

Course author

Julian Calvo, Ed.D., M.S.

Founder of DecipherU. Education researcher, software engineer, and applied AI specialist at the cybersecurity-AI convergence.

What you will be able to do

After the course, you can operate an AI-augmented SOC end-to-end: triage at scale, detect AI-specific threats, run hypothesis-driven hunts, write production playbooks, evaluate tools, and lead the integration program.

  • Triage materially more alerts per hour with AI assistance, measured

    Build AI-augmented triage workflows with documented before-and-after throughput. The course requires a measured result on your own data, not a vendor claim.

  • Map any breach to ATT&CK and ATLAS techniques

    Cover ATT&CK Enterprise, Cloud, ICS, and Mobile matrices plus ATLAS AI-specific attack techniques. Run the mapping exercise on a real or simulated campaign.

  • Run AI-augmented threat hunts with hypothesis discipline

    Hypothesis-driven hunting with AI query generation, anomaly detection, and behavioral analysis. Produce a complete hunt report with methodology documentation.

  • Detect AI-specific threats in production logs

    Write detection rules for prompt injection, AI agent misuse, model abuse, AI-generated phishing, deepfake-based fraud, and unauthorized AI usage. Rules deploy to your actual SIEM.

  • Write production AI SecOps playbooks with HITL checkpoints

    Build at least 3 production-ready playbooks (prompt injection incident, model exfiltration, deepfake fraud) with full RACI, evidence preservation steps, and mandatory human-in-the-loop decision gates.

  • Evaluate and select AI security tools with a six-dimension scorecard

    Score any AI security product on capability fit, data residency, integration depth, vendor dependency risk, total cost, and exit criteria. Separate signal from marketing.

  • Govern enterprise AI usage with policy and controls

    Draft an organizational AI usage policy, shadow AI detection plan, and audit trail design that satisfies NIST AI RMF governance functions and NYDFS / HIPAA / SR 11-7 expectations.

  • Lead a 90-day AI-augmented SOC integration with measured outcomes

    Build a transformation roadmap with phased milestones, risk register, tool selection criteria, team training plan, and a metrics framework covering both traditional SOC KPIs and AI-augmentation gains.

Curriculum

Fourteen modules cover the full AI-augmented SOC operating cycle: threats, fundamentals, ATT&CK and ATLAS mapping, triage, investigation, threat hunting, AI-specific threat detection, playbooks, tooling integration, tool evaluation, policy, metrics, transformation leadership, and a capstone. Module 14 is a complete AI-augmented SOC design document evaluated against the published rubric.

01Module 1, AI in security operations: where things stand5 lessons
  • Lesson 1.1, What AI does and doesn't do for security operationsFree preview28 min
  • Lesson 1.2, The AI-augmented SOC visionFree preview25 min
  • Lesson 1.3, Current AI security products30 min
  • Lesson 1.4, The skill shift: what changes for SOC analysts25 min
  • Lesson 1.5, The AI security operations maturity model28 min
02Module 2, SOC fundamentals refresher6 lessons
  • Lesson 2.1, The cybersecurity incident response lifecycle45 min
  • Lesson 2.2, Detection logic and the anatomy of a security alert48 min
  • Lesson 2.3, SIEM fundamentals and log analysis52 min
  • Lesson 2.4, SOAR and automation in the SOC44 min
  • Lesson 2.5, Threat intelligence in practice46 min
  • Lesson 2.6, SOC metrics and performance measurement38 min
03Module 3, MITRE ATT&CK and ATLAS deep look5 lessons
  • Lesson 3.1, MITRE ATT&CK structure and navigation40 min
  • Lesson 3.2, ATT&CK for detection engineering50 min
  • Lesson 3.3, ATT&CK for threat hunting45 min
  • Lesson 3.4, MITRE ATLAS: adversarial AI techniques48 min
  • Lesson 3.5, Mapping a breach to ATT&CK and ATLAS50 min
04Module 4, AI-augmented alert triage5 lessons
  • Lesson 4.1, The alert overload problem and why triage fails42 min
  • Lesson 4.2, Triage decision framework: NIST SP 800-61 and Funnel of Fidelity48 min
  • Lesson 4.3, Prompt engineering for alert triage54 min
  • Lesson 4.4, False-positive reduction with AI46 min
  • Lesson 4.5, Building and evaluating a triage prompt library50 min
05Module 5, AI-augmented investigation6 lessons
  • Lesson 5.1, The forensic investigation lifecycle: NIST SP 800-8644 min
  • Lesson 5.2, Evidence collection with Velociraptor and KAPE52 min
  • Lesson 5.3, Memory forensics fundamentals with Volatility55 min
  • Lesson 5.4, Timeline reconstruction and AI correlation50 min
  • Lesson 5.5, AI hypothesis generation and evidence-gap analysis55 min
  • Lesson 5.6, Human-verification checkpoints and defensible documentation48 min
06Module 6, AI-augmented threat hunting5 lessons
  • Lesson 6.1, Hunt fundamentals: hypothesis-driven methodology45 min
  • Lesson 6.2, Building hunt hypotheses from ATT&CK and threat intelligence48 min
  • Lesson 6.3, AI-assisted query generation for KQL and SPL52 min
  • Lesson 6.4, Behavioral analysis and anomaly detection with AI50 min
  • Lesson 6.5, Closing the loop: from hunt finding to detection rule44 min
07Module 7, AI-specific threat detection6 lessons
  • Lesson 7.1, The AI threat landscape: MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 1052 min
  • Lesson 7.2, Detecting prompt injection in production logs55 min
  • Lesson 7.3, Model abuse and unauthorized AI usage detection48 min
  • Lesson 7.4, AI agent misuse and autonomous action detection58 min
  • Lesson 7.5, Supply chain and training data attack detection50 min
  • Lesson 7.6, Detecting AI-enabled social engineering (deepfakes, AI phishing)56 min
08Module 8, AI security operations playbooks5 lessons
  • Lesson 8.1, Playbook design principles for AI incidents48 min
  • Lesson 8.2, Prompt injection incident response playbook52 min
  • Lesson 8.3, AI agent misuse incident response playbook50 min
  • Lesson 8.4, Model abuse incident response playbook54 min
  • Lesson 8.5, Playbook automation and SOAR integration46 min
09Module 9, Integrating AI tools into SOC workflow5 lessons
  • Lesson 9.1, The AI-augmented SOC integration framework46 min
  • Lesson 9.2, Tool selection and evaluation criteria44 min
  • Lesson 9.3, Phased deployment: from pilot to production48 min
  • Lesson 9.4, Measuring AI tool impact on SOC performance50 min
  • Lesson 9.5, Human-in-the-loop governance and rollback52 min
10Module 10, AI security tool evaluation4 lessons
  • Lesson 10.1, The AI security tool evaluation framework48 min
  • Lesson 10.2, Telemetry fit and integration depth in cybersecurity AI tools44 min
  • Lesson 10.3, Testing AI cybersecurity tools against your data42 min
  • Lesson 10.4, Scoring, selecting, and documenting AI security tool decisions38 min
11Module 11, AI usage policies and controls5 lessons
  • Lesson 11.1, Why AI usage policies fail and what makes them work46 min
  • Lesson 11.2, Acceptable use and data classification for AI interactions in cybersecurity48 min
  • Lesson 11.3, AI agent action limits and human-in-the-loop controls in cybersecurity52 min
  • Lesson 11.4, Audit, monitoring, and enforcement of AI usage in cybersecurity44 min
  • Lesson 11.5, Rollout, training, and AI policy lifecycle management in cybersecurity40 min
12Module 12, AI security operations metrics4 lessons
  • Lesson 12.1, SOC metrics foundations: MTTD, MTTR, dwell time, and false positive rate48 min
  • Lesson 12.2, Measuring AI tool contribution: baselines, deltas, and attribution46 min
  • Lesson 12.3, Governance and risk metrics for AI-augmented operations42 min
  • Lesson 12.4, Board-ready metrics narratives44 min
13Module 13, Leading AI security operations transformation5 lessons
  • Lesson 13.1, Maturity assessment: SOC-CMM and the AI-augmented dimension50 min
  • Lesson 13.2, Designing the target state: capability architecture for AI-augmented operations48 min
  • Lesson 13.3, Building the transformation roadmap: phasing, dependencies, and risk52 min
  • Lesson 13.4, The people dimension: hiring, training, and change management46 min
  • Lesson 13.5, Writing the executive business case44 min
14Module 14, Capstone: AI-augmented SOC transformation1 lessons
  • Capstone Rubric, AI Security Operations Mastery15 min

Methodology synthesis

The course makes the synthesis explicit: each source framework contributes a defined layer, so practitioners know where any concept originates and how the AI-specific application layer extends it.

MethodologyWhat it contributes
SANS SEC504, SEC511, SEC555, FOR578Hacker tools and incident handling, continuous monitoring, SIEM tactical analytics, and cyber threat intelligence. These form the operational foundation the AI layer builds on.
MITRE ATT&CKTactics, techniques, and sub-techniques across Enterprise, Cloud, ICS, and Mobile matrices. The detection and hunt mapping framework.
MITRE ATLASThreats to AI systems: model inversion, training data poisoning, prompt injection, supply chain compromise of ML systems, and AI-specific case studies.
MITRE D3FENDDefensive countermeasures mapped to ATT&CK attacks. Used in Module 8 to ground playbooks in structured countermeasure selection.
OWASP LLM Top 10 and ML Security Top 10Prompt injection, training data poisoning, model denial-of-service, supply chain risk, adversarial ML, and model theft. All mapped to detection and response procedures.
NIST CSF 2.0, AI RMF, SP 800-53, SP 800-171Governance, risk management, and control catalog alignment. AI RMF functions (Map, Measure, Manage, Govern) map directly to the Module 11 policy and controls work.
ISC2 CISSP and CCSPOperations-relevant CISSP security domains and cloud security operations, providing the certification alignment that hiring managers recognize.
Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic SOC patternsMicrosoft Copilot for Security, Sentinel, and Defender suite. Google Chronicle and Mandiant patterns. Publicly documented frontier-lab security operations procedures.

Who this cybersecurity AI SecOps course is for

The Tier 2 SOC analyst losing the alert-volume race

Your queue grows faster than your team. You know AI can help but every vendor demo promises magic and delivers a configuration project. The course teaches you to evaluate what AI actually does to throughput in your environment, measure it, and build the case for what to buy next.

The detection engineer building AI-assisted Sigma rules

You write detection logic and you want AI to generate and refine Sigma rules without hallucinating false-positive gaps. Module 7 covers AI-specific threat scenarios and the detection-engineering workflow, with exercises that produce rules you can test in your SIEM today.

The SOC lead presenting an AI-augmentation business case to a CISO

Your CISO wants numbers, not enthusiasm. The capstone is a complete AI-augmented SOC design document: current state, target state, transformation roadmap, tool selection with justification, and a metrics framework with measured ROI. The course builds it section by section.

Prerequisites

Required

  • One or more years of SOC operations or equivalent CTF and blue-team experience
  • Familiarity with at least one SIEM (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM QRadar, Chronicle, or equivalent)
  • Working knowledge of common attack techniques and the alert triage workflow
  • Willingness to commit roughly 55 to 70 hours of focused study plus capstone work

Recommended

  • Splunk SPL or KQL fluency at a working depth
  • Familiarity with MITRE ATT&CK at the technique level
  • Exposure to a SOAR platform (Palo Alto XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, or equivalent)
  • A real or recent SOC environment you can use as your capstone subject

Reviews

Reviews from the first cohort arrive Q2 2026. Capstones in the top 10% may be anonymized into case studies with explicit permission from the practitioner.

Frequently asked questions

Does this cybersecurity AI course replace SOC analysts or teach them to work with AI?

The course is built on the augmentation model, not the replacement thesis. AI reduces the alert-volume tax on Tier 1 and Tier 2 analysts and accelerates investigation, but the course treats human judgment as mandatory in the loop. Every playbook module covers where HITL checkpoints must sit and why automating past them is a governance and liability problem.

How does AI increase false-positive risk, and does the course address that?

AI classifiers trained on historical data inherit its class imbalance and can hallucinate benign context. Module 4 (AI-augmented alert triage) covers false-positive economics directly: measuring baseline FP rates, evaluating vendor FP claims, and designing feedback loops that improve classifier accuracy over time in your specific environment.

I worry about locking my SOC into one AI vendor. Does the course cover that?

Module 10 (AI security tool evaluation) uses a six-dimension scorecard covering capability fit, data residency, integration depth, vendor dependency risk, total cost (including model consumption), and exit criteria. The course is deliberately vendor-pluralist: Microsoft Copilot for Security, Splunk AI, IBM QRadar, AWS Bedrock, and Lakera Guard are all covered without endorsement of any single vendor.

What does AI security tooling actually cost a SOC budget?

Module 9 and Module 10 work through the real cost model: token consumption at scale, per-seat licensing on top of existing SIEM spend, integration engineering hours, and the ongoing cost of model updates. The course builds a cost-benefit framework so you can present a defensible business case to your CISO or CFO.

How thoroughly does the course cover MITRE ATT&CK and ATLAS?

Module 3 is a dedicated 4-hour module. It covers ATT&CK Enterprise, Cloud, ICS, and Mobile matrices plus ATLAS adversarial AI techniques (model inversion, training data poisoning, prompt injection, model evasion, supply chain compromise of ML systems). Module 7 applies that mapping to detection rule writing for AI-specific threats.

Does the course cover regulatory obligations for AI in SOC operations?

Module 11 (AI usage policies and controls) covers NYDFS Part 500 AI governance expectations, HIPAA risk analysis obligations for AI-assisted clinical security, and SR 11-7 model risk management for financial services SOCs. The module also addresses NIST AI RMF governance functions and how they map to SOC operating procedures.

How does this course compare to SANS SEC555 or FOR578?

SANS SEC555 covers SIEM tactical analytics; FOR578 covers cyber threat intelligence. This course presupposes that foundation and builds the AI-specific layer on top. The methodology synthesis matrix shows exactly what SEC504, SEC511, SEC555, and FOR578 each contribute versus what the AI-augmentation layer adds. This is the next step after SANS, not a replacement for it.

What credential does the AI Security Operations Mastery course issue?

Approved capstones earn the AI Security Operations Mastery verifiable credential, signed with Ed25519 and embeddable on LinkedIn. The capstone is a 30 to 40 page AI-augmented SOC design document plus a 30-minute presentation evaluated against the published rubric. The credential is renewable through one continuing-practice exercise per year. Issued by DecipherU. It is a course-completion credential, not an accredited degree or a vendor-issued certification.

Can I get a refund?

Yes. Seven-day full refund from purchase, while you have completed less than 10% of the course. Email support@decipheru.com with your order number; refunds process within 3 business days. After 7 days or above 10% completion, refunds are case-by-case. A refund triggers a 90-day lockout on re-purchasing this course or subscribing to a tier that bundles it.

What if I don't have the prerequisites?

The required baseline is 1 or more years of SOC operations or equivalent CTF and blue-team experience, plus familiarity with at least one SIEM. If you are below that, the DecipherU SOC Analyst Fundamentals course covers the operational foundation. Enrolling in AI Security Operations Mastery without the baseline means the early modules will feel rushed and the capstone will be very difficult to complete.

Free · No accountRead a full sample lesson before you enrollOpen the sample →

This course is part of a packaged path

Or see the packaged paths that use this course

Each path bundles the curriculum sequence, the compensation delta it unlocks, and the recommended courses (this one is on the list). If you are not sure which path matches your starting point, the 2-minute AI Risk Score routes you to the right one.

Related cybersecurity courses

Last verified: April 2026?Report an inaccuracy

Enroll · $497

7-day refund · Self-paced · Lifetime access

Enroll →