Situational Judgment Tests for Cybersecurity Personnel Selection

What Did This Cybersecurity Research Find?

This cybersecurity hiring tool study developed and tested situational judgment tests (SJTs) presenting realistic security scenarios to 900 candidates. Cybersecurity-specific SJTs predicted on-the-job performance at levels comparable to cognitive ability tests (validity = 0.38) while producing significantly less adverse impact across demographic groups.

Key Findings

• 1Cybersecurity SJTs achieved predictive validity of 0.38 for job performance
• 2Adverse impact was 60% lower compared to cognitive ability tests
• 3SJTs measuring incident response judgment had the highest validity for SOC roles
• 4Candidates rated SJTs as more face-valid and job-relevant than abstract reasoning tests
• 5SJTs added incremental validity (delta R-squared = 0.08) beyond cognitive ability alone

How Does This Apply to Cybersecurity Careers?

Organizations seeking fair, valid hiring tools can consider SJTs as an alternative or supplement to traditional testing. Candidates can expect more scenario-based assessments in hiring processes.

Who Should Read This?

Frequently Asked Questions